The Inclusion of Literature Components in Malaysian English Papers: the Challenges and Pros in Teaching and Learning

Yahya Omar

Abstract


The low proficiency attainment in English language among Malaysian learners has been given main attention in Malaysia Ministry of Education’s plan to further improve education. Part of the plan is by introducing literature components in the teaching and learning of English language curriculum. This has immediately changed the scenario of teaching and learning in English language classroom. This paper will review past studies related to the implementation of Literature component in English language by looking specifically at the teacher’s roles since teachers are the direct factor contributor in learners’ process of learning and teaching. Apart of roles in the learning process, teachers’ approaches employed in teaching literature component will be critically reviewed in this paper and suitable approaches available in teaching literature in English will be put forward.

Keywords


Teachers’ approaches; teaching of literature in English; low proficiency learners.

10.15548/jt.v24i3.335 Abstract view : 433 times PDF : 221 times

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrams, M. H., & Harpham, G. (2011). A glossary of literary terms. Cengage Learning.

Aghagolzadeh, F., & Tajabadi, F. (2012). A Debate on Literature as a Teaching Material in FLT. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 3(1).

Agrawal, M. (2004). Curricular reform in schools: the importance of evaluation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(3), 361–379.

Aziz, M. A., & Nasharudin, S. N. S. (2010). An investigation on approaches used to teach literature in the ESL classroom: A case study of Sekolah menengah Kebangsaan Taman Desa Skudai, Johor Bahru. Unpublished Article. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Barnes, C. J. (2006). Preparing preservice teachers to teach in a culturally responsive way. Negro Educational Review, 57(1/2), 85.

Bernat, E., & Lloyd, R. (2007). Exploring the gender effect on EFL learners’ beliefs about language learning.

Blachowicz, C., & Ogle, D. (2017). Reading comprehension: Strategies for independent learners. Guilford Publications.

Che Musa, N., Lie, K. Y., & Azman, H. (2012). Exploring English Language Learning And Teaching In Malaysia. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(1).

Chien, C. H., Yunus, M. M., & Mohamad, M. (2008). Who We Are’in Enhancing Rural Students’ English as a Second Language (ESL) Learning. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(5), 162–167.

Collie, J., & Slater, S. (2004). Literature in the language classroom: A resource book of ideas and activities. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Cynthia, A. (2009). Approaches for teaching literature used by (T) ESL trainees during teaching practice (an analysis of lesson plan).

Dhanapal, S. (2010a). Cultivating critical and creative thinking skills through an integrated approach to the teaching of literary texts.

---. (2010b). Stylistics and reader response: An integrated approach to the teaching of literary texts. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 1(4), 233–240.

Donato, R., & Brooks, F. B. (2004). Literary discussions and advanced speaking functions: Researching the (DIS) connection. Foreign Language Annals, 37(2), 183–199.

Estes, C. A. (2004). Promoting student-centered learning in experiential education. Journal of Experiential Education, 27(2), 141–160.

Govindasamy, M., & Jan, J. M. (2017). Influence of expertise of Malaysian English language teachers’on their subject matter knowledge of literary devices. Language & Communication, 4(1), 42.

Granger, S. (2003). The international corpus of learner English: a new resource for foreign language learning and teaching and second language acquisition research. Tesol Quarterly, 37(3), 538–546.

Hadaway, N. L., Vardell, S. M., & Young, T. A. (2002). Literature-based instruction with English language learners, K-12. Prentice Hall.

Hall, L. A. (2005). Teachers and content area reading: Attitudes, beliefs and change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 403–414.

Hedge, T. (2001). Teaching and learning in the language classroom (Vol. 106). Oxford University Press Oxford,, UK.

Henson, K. T. (2003). Foundations for learner-centered education: A knowledge base. Education, 124(1), 5–17.

Hickman, P., Pollard-Durodola, S., & Vaughn, S. (2004). Storybook reading: Improving vocabulary and comprehension for English-language learners. The Reading Teacher, 57(8), 720–730.

Hwang, D., Hwang, D., & Embi, M. A. (2007). Approaches employed by secondary school teachers to teaching the literature component in English. The Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education (Formerly Known as Journal of Educators and Education), 22(1), 1–23.

Isa, N. H., & Mahmud, C. T. (2012). Literary Texts for Malaysian Secondary Schools: Needs versus Policy. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(7), 76–86.

Ismail, F., Aziz, M. A., & Abdullah, T. (2008). Literature in English language teaching: a revisit in the Malaysian context. Research in English Language Teaching (53-68). Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Janzen, J. (2008). Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1010–1038.

Kachru, B. B. (2006). The English language in the outer circle. World Englishes, 3, 241–255.

Khatib, M., & Rahimi, A. H. (2012). Literature and language teaching. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies, 2(6), 32–38.

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2013). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching 3rd edition-Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers. Oxford university press.

Lau, S. M.-C. (2013). A study of critical literacy work with beginning English language learners: An integrated approach. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 10(1), 1–30.

Lawal, A. (2010). Values and limitations of using literary text for teaching ESL.

Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Lee, K. (2000). English teachers’ barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(12), 1–8.

Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

Maley, A. (2001). Literature in the language classroom. na.

Mishan, F. (2005). Designing authenticity into language learning materials. Intellect Books.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017.

Mok, S. S. (2008). Educational psychology & pedagogy: Learner and learning environment. Penerbitan Multimedia.

Nasharudin, S. N. S., & Nadia, S. (2008). An Investigation on Approaches Used to Teach Literature in the ESL Classroom: A Case Study of Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Taman Desa Skudai, Johor Bahru (PhD Thesis). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Nunan, D. (2006). Task-based language teaching. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443–468.

Olson, C. B., & Land, R. (2007). A cognitive strategies approach to reading and writing instruction for English language learners in secondary school. Research in the Teaching of English, 269–303.

Pachler, N., Evans, M., Redondo, A., & Fisher, L. (2013). Learning to teach foreign languages in the secondary school: A companion to school experience. Routledge.

Paesani, K. (2005). Literary texts and grammar instruction: Revisiting the inductive presentation. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 15–23.

Paran, A. (2008). The role of literature in instructed foreign language learning and teaching: An evidence-based survey. Language Teaching, 41(4), 465–496.

Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.

Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513–536.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge university press.

Roussou, M. (2004). Learning by doing and learning through play: an exploration of interactivity in virtual environments for children. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 2(1), 10–10.

Samuel, R., & Bakar, Z. (2008). The effectiveness of ‘VELT’in promoting English language communication skills: A case study in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 4(3).

Shah, P. M., & Empungan, J. L. (2015). ESL teachers’ attitudes towards using ICT in literature lessons. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(1), 201–218.

Sidhu, G. K. (2003). Literature in the language classroom: Seeing through the eyes of learners.

Sidhu, G. K., Kaur, S., Fook, C. Y., & Yunus, F. W. (2013). Postgraduate supervision: Exploring Malaysian students’ experiences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 133–141.

Siti Norliana, G. (2003). Learner profiles based on attitudes towards literature. MA Practicum Report. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Sivapalan, S., Ahmad, W., & Fatimah, W. (2010). A web-based multimedia approach to literature in Malaysian secondary schools: learners’ preferences. European Journal of Social Sciences, 12(3).

Sivapalan, S., Ahmad, W., Fatimah, W., & Ishak, N. K. N. (2009). A Web-Based Multimedia Approach to Literature in Malaysian Secondary Schools: Design and Learning Preferences.

Sivapalan, S., Idrus, H., Bhattacharyya, E., & Nordin, S. M. (2017). Engineering students’perception of the influence of young adult literature on developing appreciation for reading. The English Teacher, 13.

Sivapalan, S., & Subramaniam, G. (2008). The Incorporation of Literature in the English Language Program for Engineering Students: Learner Interest and Perception. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 14, 45–73.

Sivasubramaniam, S. (2006). Promoting the prevalence of literature in the practice of foreign and second language education: Issues and insights. Asian EFL Journal, 8(4), 254–273.

Street, B. V. (2014). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. Routledge.

Suriya Kumar, S. (2004). A study of the motivational factors that influence the learning of literature among upper secondary school students in Negeri Sembilan. MA Practicum Report. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy, 11, 1–15.

Vacca, R. T., Vacca, J. A. L., & Mraz, M. E. (2005). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum.

Van, T. T. M. (2009). The relevance of literary analysis to teaching literature in the EFL classroom. In English Teaching Forum (Vol. 47, p. 2). ERIC.

Vardell, S. M., Hadaway, N. L., & Young, T. A. (2006). Matching books and readers: Selecting literature for English learners. The Reading Teacher, 59(8), 734–741.

Watts, R. S. (2000). An Alternative School within a School: A Case Study on Meeting Motivational, Curricula, and Instructional Needs of At-Risk Students.

Wei, Y. S., Hutagalung, F., & Zakaria, A. R. (2015). Correlation between literacy and numeracy screening test and children cognitive level. In The Role of Service in the Tourism & Hospitality Industry: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Management and Technology in

Knowledge, Service, Tourism & Hospitality 2014 (SERVE 2014), Gran Melia, Jakarta, Indonesia, 23-24 August 2014 (p. 65). CRC Press.

Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35.

Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (2004). Psycology for language teachers. Ernst Klett Sprachen.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v24i3.335

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Al-Ta lim Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Stats
Al-Ta’lim Journal published by Faculty of Islamic Education and Teacher Training UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Copyright © Al-Ta'lim Online Journal, Print ISSN 1410-7546 Online ISSN 2355-7893, All rights reserved


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.