The Use of Small Group Discussion and Snowballing Techniques: An Effort to enhance EFL Students’ Self –Efficacy and Speaking Skill

Ade Silvana, Martin Kustati, Darmayanti Darmayanti

Abstract


This paper is aimed at discussing on Small Group Discussion and Snowballing techniques enhance students’ self-efficacy and speaking skill on hortatory exposition text at class XI State Islamic Senior High School 1 Padang in academic year 2016/2017. The experimental research type and factorial design were used to conduct the research. Two groups of experimental classes, who were cluster randomly selected, were taught by different techniques. First group was taught by Snowballing and second one was taught by Small Group Discussion. Both groups were given post-test after they got different treatments to find out whether both two groups shown differences and the effectiveness of the different treatments. Speaking test and questionnaires were used to collect the data. The t- test and two ways ANOVA were used to analyze the data. The results of the research have shown that students who were taught by snowballing were better than those who were taught by small group discussion in speaking skill on hortatory text. The students’ self-efficacy in speaking skill that was taught by snowballing was higher than that was taught by small group discussion. The students with high self-efficacy got higher speaking score than students with low self-efficacy. It is concluded that Snowballing technique gives more significant effect on students self-efficacy in speaking skill than Small Group discussion one. It is recommended that English teachers have to use Snowballing technique to increase students’ self-efficacy and skill in speaking.


Keywords


Small group discussion; snowballing; self-efficacy; speaking skill

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abeywickrama, P., & Brown, H. D. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. NY: Pearson Longman.

AbuSeileek, A. F. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning methods and group size on the EFL learners’ achievement in communication skills. Computers & Education, 58(1), 231–239.

Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5(1), 307–337.

Barton, D. (2017). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. John Wiley & Sons.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching.

Burns, A., & Joyce, H. (1997). Focus on Speaking. ERIC.

Canale, M. (2014). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In Language and communication (pp. 14–40). Routledge.

Carless, D. (2007). Student use of the mother tongue in the task-based classroom. ELT Journal, 62(4), 331–338.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. Fillmore, L. W., &

Snow, C. E. (2000). What teachers need to know about language.

Finegan, E. (2014). Language: Its structure and use. Cengage Learning.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. London/New York.

Hymes, D. (2005). Models of the interaction of language and social life: toward a descriptive theory. Intercultural Discourse and Communication: The Essential Readings, 4–16.

Lin, S. S., Liu, E. Z.-F., & Yuan, S.-M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420–432.

Liu, Jianxin. (2008). The generic and rhetorical structures of expositions in English by Chinese ethnic minorities: A perspective from

intracultural contrastive rhetoric. Language and Intercultural Communication, 8(1), 2–20.

Liu, Jun. (2001). Asian students’ classroom communication patterns in US universities: An emic perspective. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. (2001). The development of academic self-efficacy. Development of Achievement Motivation. United States, 7.

Richards, J. C. (2005). Communicative language teaching today. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

Rustipa, K. (2014). Metadiscourse in Indonesian EFL learners’ persuasive texts: A case study at English department, UNISBANK. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(1), 44.

Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. Psychology Press.

Shumin, K. (2002). Factors to consider: Developing adult EFL students’ speaking abilities. Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice, 12, 204–211.

Weinstein, N. D., & Sandman, P. M. (1992). A model of the precaution adoption process: evidence from home radon testing. Health Psychology, 11(3), 170




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15548/jt.v25i1.409

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Al-Ta lim Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Stats
Al-Ta’lim Journal published by Faculty of Islamic Education and Teacher Training UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Copyright © Al-Ta'lim Online Journal, Print ISSN 1410-7546 Online ISSN 2355-7893, All rights reserved


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.