The Changing of Islamic education curriculum Paradigm in Public Universities

Yusuf Hanafi

doi:10.15548/jt.v26i3.552

The Changing of Islamic education curriculum Paradigm in Public Universities

Yusuf Hanafi

Abstract

Since the reformation era, the curriculum of Islamic Education in public universities has gone through such three modifications as Islamic education curriculum of 2000, 2002, and 2013. The objective of this research is to analyze the construction of the three kinds of the curriculum as well as the changing of the paradigm related to them comparatively. The paradigm of Islamic education curriculum 2000 was the continuity of the curriculum in the New Order era which was purely oriented to normative Islamic concepts (aqidah, syari’at, akhlak). In the opposite, Curriculum 2002 indicated many changes in its paradigm and material. Religion was not only a set of norms, but it also existed in reality and it was dynamic in responding the development of human being. Meanwhile, curriculum 2013 tried to emphasize the scientific learning approach by activating the students in building their knowledge. In other words, the learning activity is activity base-oriented, not content base-oriented.

Keywords

Changing of paradigm; Islamic education curriculum in public universities; curriculum 2013

10.15548/jt.v26i3.552

Abstract view : 774 times

PDF : 517 times

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdullah, M. A. (2007). Desain Pengembangan Akademik IAIN Menuju UIN Sunan Kalijaga. Dalam Integrasi Ilmu Dan Agama, Interpretasi Dan Aksi, Zainal Abidin Bagir Dll.

Coleman, S., & Robinson, J. B. (2018). Introducing the qualitative performance gap: Stories about a sustainable building. Building Research & Information, 46(5), 485–500.

Court, D. (2013). Religious experience as an aim of religious education. British Journal of Religious Education, 35(3), 251–263.

Daun, H., & Arjmand, R. (2005). Islamic education. In International Handbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research (pp. 377–388). Springer.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research.

Douglass, S. L., & Shaikh, M. A. (2004). Defining Islamic Education: Differentiation and Applications. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 7(1), 5–18.

Fransisca, L., & Ajisuksmo, C. R. (2015). Keterkaitan antara moral knowing, moral feeling, dan moral behavior pada empat kompetensi dasar guru. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 45(2).

Halstead, M. (2004). An Islamic concept of education. Comparative Education, 40(4), 517–529.

Hilgendorf, E. (2003). Islamic education: History and tendency. Peabody Journal of Education, 78(2), 63–75.

Hook, J. N., Farrell, J. E., Johnson, K. A., Van Tongeren, D. R., Davis, D. E., & Aten, J. D. (2017). Intellectual humility and religious tolerance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(1), 29–35.

Lukens-Bull, R. A. (2001). Two sides of the same coin: Modernity and tradition in Islamic education in Indonesia. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 32(3), 350–372.

Muhadjir, N. (2000). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi IV. Yogyakarta. Penerbit Rake Sarasin.

Nor, M. R. M., & Malim, M. (2014). Revisiting Islamic education: The case of Indonesia. Journal for Multicultural Education.

Pohl, F. (2006). Islamic education and civil society: Reflections on the pesantren tradition in contemporary Indonesia. Comparative Education Review, 50(3), 389–409.

Teng, L. S. (2016). Changes in teachers’ beliefs after a professional development project for teaching writing: Two Chinese cases. Journal of Education for TEaching, 42(1), 106–109.

Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522–537.

Yani, M. T. (2009). Dinamika Pendidikan Islam di Perguruan Tinggi Umum. Jurnal Penelitian Keislaman, 2(5).

Yasin, F. B. R., & Jani, M. (2013). Islamic education: The philosophy, aim, and main features. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(10), 1–18.

Ziebertz, H.-G., & Riegel, U. (2007). Religious education and values. Journal of Empirical Theology, 20(1), 52–76.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v26i3.552