The Implementation of Process Oriented Learning Motivation Improvement Method for the English Department Students of Padang State Polytechnic School

Doni Marzuki, Hidayat Al-Azmi

Abstract


The learning motivation on language learning as suggested by Chomsky gives a significant effect on the way the language learner learn and its’ achievement. The motivation may come from the outside or the inside of the leaner. Assuming that there are some factors affecting the students’ motivation, it is necessary to know whether the Process Oriented Learning Motivation method can increase the students’ motivation or not. Beside knowing the effect of using the method, it is also important to know whether the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation has a positive contribution on the learning achievement. To know it, an experimental was done. By applying the treatment and using some additional instrument, questionnaire with open – ended questions, this research prove some points related to the motivation and the improvement. This research reveals that the model of process learning oriented improve the students’ learning motivation. Another  finding of this research also suggest that the extrinsic motivation has more dominant role on the student learning achievement meanwhile the students parents work as well as their (students’) educational background contribute their motivation in learning.   


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alison, J. (1993). Not bothered? Motivating reluctant language learners in Key Stage 4: London: CILT.

Benson, P. (2000). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.

Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and Problems of Knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating, Quantitative and Qualitative Research (3 ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determinaton in human behaviour. New York: Plenum.

Dornyei, Z. & Otto, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 4: 43-69.

Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Motivation. England: Pearson Education Limited.

Good, T. L. & Brophy, J. E. (1994). Looking in classrooms. 6 th edition. New York: HarperCollins.

Lepper, M. R. (1988). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 289-310.

Lile, W. T. (2010). Motivation in the ESL Classroom. Retrieved on Marc 20th, 2012 from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Lile-Motivation.html

Lumsden, L. (1994). Student motivation to Learn. Emergency Librarian, 22 (2), 31-32.

Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS Survival Manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (2nd ed). New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.

Peter, R. (2000). Overcoming Underachieving. New York: Broadway Books.

Rothman, S. (2003). The changing influence of socioeconomic status on student achievement: recent evidence from Australia. The Annual Meeting of The American Education Research Association, Chicago, April 2003. [online] Available at http://forms.acer.edu.au/documents/LSAY_CP_AERA2003Rothman.pdf.

Schmidt, R., Boraie, D., & Kassabgy, O. (1996). Foreign language motivation: Internal structure and external connections. In R.L. Oxford, (Ed.), Language learning motivation: Pathways to the new century (pp. 9–70). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre.

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M, Senécal, C., Vallières, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003-1017.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Research in English Language Teaching

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.