Soft Skill: Its Urgency and Development at Islamic Higher Education

Ahmad Sabri


The success of a person in a career work is not only determined by his or her technical capability, but also the non-technical skills which is so called ‘soft-skills’.  It is an attitude which is exemplified among the cognitive and values in the interaction with people around. Several identified falures in the community’s life indicate that many Islamic university graduates suffered from lack of ability to build  harmonious relationship with the environment.  Therefore, it is a high time for this institution to consistently instil some types of soft-skills on the parts of the students.  The current study shares the urgent needs for developing students’ soft-skills for Islamic colleges and universities. The paper ends up with several conclusions while promoting some commitments to be held by the faculty development including: the identification of soft-skills that have already existed in the students’ minds and which need to be developed, the exploration of soft skills attributes for the next 5 years based on the inspiration or opinion of the stake holders and alumnaes, the setting of action plan for academic and non-cademic agendas, acting out the planned activities, as well as the sustainable blue-print of valid soft-skills.


Copyright © 2014 by Al-Ta'lim All right reserved


Soft skills, Islamic Higher Education, hard-skills, learning strategies

10.15548/jt.v21i3.109 Abstract view : 650 times PDF : 354 times

Full Text:



Airasian, P. W., dan Walsh, M. E. (1997). Construction Caoutions. Phi Delta Kaooan, 78 (6).

Alberta, E. (2005). The Heart of Matter: Character and Citizenship Education in Alberta School. Alberta: Alberta Education, Learning and Teaching Resources Branching, Minister of Education.

Al-Ghulayani, M. (1953). Idhah al-Nasihin. Pekalongan: Rajamurah.

Arifin, I. (996). (Ed.). Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan. Malang: Kalimasahada Press.

Based Teaching on English Language Learnes Understanding of science in a Middle School Classroom. Unpublished Dissertation. Kansas State University. (Online).( 30 Mei 2010).

Berkowitz, M.W. & Bier, M. C. (2005). What Works in Character Education: A Research-driven Guide for Educators. Washington: Character Education Partnership

Brooks, J.G, & Brooks, M. (1993). The case for constructivist classrooms.Association for supervision and curriculum development.Alexandria Virginia.

Character Education Partnership. (2003). Character Education Quality Standards. Washington: Character Education Partnership.

Chen. C. (2003). A Constructivist Approach to Teaching: Implications in Teaching Computer Networking, Information Technology, Learning, Performance Journal, Vol 21, No 2: 17-27.

Cholisin. (2004). Konsolidasi Demokrasi melalui Pengembangan Karakter Kewargane-garaan, Jurnal Civics, Vol. 1, No. 1: 14-28.

Cooper. P.A. (2008). Paradigm Shift in Designed Instruction: From Behaviorism to Cognitivism to Constructivism. Educational Tchnology. 33: 1-15.

Cholewinski, M. (2009). An introduction to Constructivism and Authentic Activity, No. 5, Bulletin Universitas Study Asing Kontemporer Internasional Nagoya, (Online), ( Retrived on October 25th 2009).

Dabbel, J. (2007). The 5Es. (Online) (http//, diakses 6 Januari 2010).

Degeng N.S. (1997). Pandangan Behavioristik vs Konstruktivistik: Pemecahan Masalah Belajar Abad XXI. Malang: Paper TEP. Page 12.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Fifth Edition. New York: Longman.

Dewey, J. (1897). My Paedagogic Creed. School Journal, 54: 77-80.

Duffy, T.M., & Jonassen, D.H., (1992). Constructivism and The Technology of Instruction: A Conversation. Lawrence Erbaum Associates, Publishers Hillsdale, New Jersey.

Doolitle, P. (2000). Constructivism in Science Education Advanced Educational Phsycology Project., (online), http://, Retrieved on Oktober 26th 2010.

Gergen, K.J. (1985). The Social Contructionist Movement in Modern Psychology.American Psychologist, 40: 266-275.

Giesen, J. (2001). Constructivisme: A Holistic Approach to Teaching and Learning, (Online), ( Retrived on August 10th 2009.

Gundogdu, K. (2010). The Effect of Construcivist Instruction on Prospective Teachers’ Attitudes toward Human Right Education.Electronic Journal of Research Educational Phsichology (EJREP), 8(1): 333-352.

Halstead, J. M & Taylor, M. J. (2000). Learning and Teaching about Values: A Review of Recent Research.” Cambridge Journal of Education. Vol. 30 No.2: 158- 167.

Hoover, W.A. (2009). SEDL Letter, The Practice Implications of Constructivism, Vol.IX, No 3: 1-2.

Huitt, W, G. (2009). Constructivism. Educational Phsycology Interactive.Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University, (Online), (

Jonanssen, D.H. (1990). Objectivism Versus Constructivism: Do We Need NewPhilosophical Paradigm? ERT & D, Vol. 29, No. 3:5-14.

Kanselaar,G. (2002). Construktivism and socio-constructivism, (online), (http://edu.fss. Retrieved on January 27th 2010).

Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pusat Kurikulum. (2010). Pengembangan Pendidikan Budaya dan Karakter Bangsa.Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional: Jakarta.

Kerr, D. (1999). Citizenship Education in the Curriculum: An International Review,” The School Field. Vol. 10: 3-4.

Kim, J. S., (2005). The Effect of a Constructivist Teaching Aprroach on Student Academic Achievment, Self-concept and Learning Strategies.Asian Pacific Education Review, Vol. 6 (1): 7-19.

Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for Character: How Our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam Books.

Lorsbach, A. W. (2002). The Learning Cycle as a Tool for Planning Science Instruction. (Online) ( 257lrcy.htm. Retrieved on January 6th 2010.

Majid, A. & Andayani, D. (2004). Pendidikan Agama Islam Berbasis Kompetensi, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Miami Musium of Science. 2001. Constructivism and the Five E’s. (Online), http//, diakses pada 6 Januari 2010.

Moleong, L.J. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung:Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muhadjir, N. (2000). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif .Yogyakarta: Reka Serasin.

Muhaimin. (2004). (Ed. 3). Paradigma Pendidikan Islam. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muntholi’ah. (2002). (Ed. 1). Konsep Diri Positif Penunjang Prestasi PAI. Semarang: Gunung Jati.

Narbuko, C & Achmadi, A. (2002). MetodologiPenelitian. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Renner, J. W., Abraham. M. R., dan Birnie, H.H. (1988). The Necessity of Each Phase of The Learning Cycle in Teaching High School Physics. Journal of Research in Scence Teaching. Vol 25 (1): 39-58.

Resnick, L.B. (1998). Learning in School and Out. Educational Research, 16 (9): 1623-1540.

Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist Pedagogy. Teacher College Record, 105 (9): 1623-1540.

Roblyer, M. D. (2006). (4th Ed.) Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Merril l Prentice Hall.

Rusydiyah, E. F. (2008). Pendidikan Karakter: Antara Cita dan Fakta pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Saleh, A.R. (2001). Didaktik Pendidikan Agama.Jakarta: Bulan Bintang Press.

Samsuri. (2004). Civic Virtues dalam Pendidikan Moral dan Kewarganegaraan di Indonesia Era Orde Baru. Jurnal Civics, Vol. 1 (2): 1.15.

Samsuri. (2007). Civic Education Berbasis Pendidikan Moral di China.Acta Civicus, Vol. 1 (1): 23-32.

SEDL (Southwest Educational Development Laboratory). (1995). Constructing Knowledge in the Classroom: Building an Understanding of Constructivism. Clasroom Compass.Vol 1 (3): 1-10.

Seefeldt, W. A., dan Foster, E. (2007). Constructifism: A Highly Effective Instructional Strategy, (Online), ( Retrieved 30 Mei 2010.

Seimears, C. M. (2007). An exploratory Case Study: The Impact of Constructivist. New York: Longman.

Sukardjo & Komaruddin, U. (2009). Landasan Pendidikan; Konsep dan Aplikasinya.Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suparno, P. (1997). Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan.Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Tynjala, P. (1999). Towards Expert Knowledge? A Comparision Between a Constructivist and Traditional LearningEnvironment in the University. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(5): 357-442.

Thoha, C & Mu’ti, A. (1998). (Ed. 1). PBM-PAI di Sekolah, Eksistensi dan Proses Belajar Mengajar Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah: Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2003. (2003). Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, Jogjakarta: Media Wacana.

Voos. J., Wiley.J. & Carretero, M. (1995). Acquiring Intelktuals Skills.Annual Review of Psychology, 46 (1) :155-88 .

Von Glasserfeld, E. (1989). Knowing Without Metaphysics: Aspek of the Radical Constructifist Positions. In F. Steir (Ed.), Research and Reflexitivity: Toward a cybernetic/social Constructivist Way of Knowing. London: Sage.

Vrasidas, C. (2000). Constructivism Versus Objectifism: Implication for Interaction, Cours Designe, and Evaluation in Distance Education. International Journal of Educational telecommunications, 6 (4): 339-362.

Williams, M. M. (2000). Models of Character Education: Perspectives and Developmental Issues.The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development. Vol. 39 (1): 32-40.

Yager, R.E. (1991). The Constructivist learning Model: toward Real Reform in Science Education. The Science Teacher, 56 (6), 52-57.

Zarei, G. R. & Esfandiari, M. A. 2008. The Effect Constructist vs Conventional Teaching on Reading Comprehension, Medwell Journal, The Socikal Science, 3 (8): 606-610.

Zurayq, M.M. (2003). Sukses Mendidik Anak. (Translation). Badruddin. Jakarta: Serambi.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2014 Al-Ta lim Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Stats
Al-Ta’lim Journal published by Faculty of Islamic Education and Teacher Training UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Al-Ta'lim Online Journal
Print ISSN 1410-7546 Online ISSN 2355-7893

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.