Evaluation and Social Internship Program of IAIN Sultan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi Students: Using Context, Input, Process and Product Model (CIPP Model)

Muhammad Hurmaini

Abstract


The purpose of the research is to know the context, input, process and product evaluation on the Social Internship Program (Kukerta) of IAIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi Students by using Participatory Action Research (PAR) system. The research is conducted in four locations of  IAIN Sultan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi students’ Kukerta in first period of 2013; Lubuk Terap, Sengeti Kecamatan Sekernan, unas, and Simpang Tiga Sipin by using questionnaire. All students of Kukerta in these 4 locations, consists of 51 people become the sample of this study. The finding of the study showed that first, context evaluation of PAR system Kukerta programs is actually having many deficiencies and weakness in both determining the needs as well as the purpose of Kukerta program. Therefore, it needs some improvements or revision. Second, input evaluation of  PAR system Kukerta shows some weakness from the students and the internship supervisors/ advisors. Both students and internship supervisors have to be firstly provided by training on  PAR system Kukerta. Third, process evaluation on the program is also lack of the relevant activities towards students’ needs and program realization. Fourth, product evaluation reveals that there is no significant result of the program, physically or non-physically. It can be recommended that the program can be continued with some improvements and revision on its implementation.

 

Copyright © 2015 by Al-Ta'lim All right reserved


Keywords


CIPP Model, Social Internship Program, PAR System

10.15548/jt.v22i1.114 Abstract view : 406 times PDF : 371 times

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, S.B. & Ball, S. (1978). The Profession and Practice of Program Evaluastion. Sans Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Arikunto, S., Jabar, A., & Safruddin, E. (2004). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. (1986). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bina Aksara

Borg, W.R. & Damien, G.M. (1979). Educational Reseach an Introduction. New York Longman.

Brannen, J. (2002). Memadu Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Faisal, S. (1990). Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar-dasar Aplikasi. Malang: YA3.

Farida, Y.T. (2000). Evaluasi Program. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Farmer, J.A. & Papagianis, G. (1975). Program Evaluation: Functional Education for Family Life Planning, III. New York: World Education.

Fernandes, W. & Tendon, R. (1993). Riset Partisipatoris Riset Pembebasan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Grotelueschen, A.G. Program Evaluation. (dalam Alan B. Knox). (1980). Developing, Administering, and Evaluating Adult Education. Sans Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Guba, E.G. Lincoln YS. (1981). Effective Evaluation. San Francisco. Jossey Bass.

Hamalik, O. 1989. Teknik Pengukuran dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

http://akhmadsudrajat. Wordpress.com/2008/02/14/ Pendekatan-Sosial-dalam-kegiatan kkn/. Retrieved on March 10, 2008.

http://LpmSigma.cq.cc/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=18xitemid=1. Retrieved on April 6, 2008.

http://publik.brawijaya.ac.id/?hlm=jedliq&ed=1157043600&edid=1145933808. Retrieved on April 19, 2008.

http://www.denpost.net/2008/08/19/negara.htm. Retrieved on April 26, 2008.

http://www.Sunan-ampel.ac.id/berita/detail.php?id=67. Retrieved on April 26, 2008.

http:/www.Fitrotunniswah/search?q= eache: 6087m VSjFcEj:fia-S1 unipdu.blogspot.com. Retrieved on March 10, 2008.

IAIN STS Jambi. (2011). Buku Pedoman Kuliah Kerja Nyata IAIN STS Jambi ke-37 Gelombang I Tahun 2011. Jambi: Lembaga Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat IAIN STS Jambi.

J.P. Dickenson. CG. Et al. (1992). Geografi Negara Berkembang. London dan New York. Methenn.

Lincohn, Y. S, Guba, E. G. (1984). Naturalistic Inquiry. London: Sage Publication.

Made, P. (1988). Perencanaan Pendidikan Partisipatori dengan Pendekatan Sistem. Jakarta: Depdikbud Dirjen Perguruan Tinggi Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan.

Mikkelsen, B. (2001). Metode Penelitian Partisipatoris dan Upaya-upaya Pemberdayaan: Sebuah Buku Pegangan bagi Para Praktisi Lapangan. Jakarta: Obor Indonesia.

Muri, Y. (2005). Dasar-dasar dan Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang.

Ornstein, A.C., Hupkins, F.P. (1989). Curriculum Foundation Principles and Issues. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

Popham, W.J. (1975). Educational Evaluation. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Sodikun, I. (2005). Kumpulan Makalah Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan dalam Berbagai Seminar dan Pelatihan. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang.

Sudjana, D. (2006). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabetta.

Syaodih, N. (2005). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung. Rosda Karya.

Tyler,W. (1969). Education Evaluation. Chicago. New Roles New Means. Illionois: The University Press.

Worthen. B.R. & Sanders, J.R. (1987). Educational Evaluation Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, New York. Pitman Publishing Inc.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v22i1.114

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Al-Ta lim Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Stats
Al-Ta’lim Journal published by Faculty of Islamic Education and Teacher Training UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Copyright © Al-Ta'lim Online Journal, Print ISSN 1410-7546 Online ISSN 2355-7893, All rights reserved


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.