Theses Originality: An Initial Effort to Examine Students’ Final Projects

Teuku Zulfikar, Elismawati Elismawati, Yuhardi Yuhardi

Abstract


Thesis is a prerequisite for graduation in all academic institutions. Higher Education institutions, such as Imam Bonjol Islamic State Institute requires its students to write a thesis in order to graduate. Students write their theses and they were examined before the board of examiners. However, students found it difficult to write ‘good’ theses that show academic honesty and high level of originality. This is a big issue in our institution, this article, therefore examines factors that reduce originality of students’ theses. Having analysed over 10 theses using content analysis method, the authors found that almost all theses contain issues that reduces the originality of the theses. Students frequently commit structural plagiarism, in which they tend to follow the structure of their colleagues’ theses, and only made minor changes. Other finding showed that in stating their research problem, students make a claim without appropriate justification. Issues of referencing and paraphrasing are two important issues that reduce qualities of students’ theses.

Keywords


Theses, theses originality, EFL students, higher education institution

10.15548/jt.v21i2.86 Abstract view : 779 times PDF : 465 times

Full Text:

PDF

References


Babbie, E. (2008). The basic of social research. 4th edition. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth

Ballantine, J. & Larres, P. M. (2012). Perceptions of authorial identity in academic writing among undergraduate accounting students: Implications of unintentional plagiarism. Accounting Education: an International Journal. 21-3, 289-306.

Hirvela, A & Du, Q. (2013). “Why am I paraphrasing ?” undergraduate ESL writers’ engagement with source based academic writing and reading. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 12. 87-98.

Lipson, C. (2005). How to write a BA thesis. A practical guide from your first ideas to your finished paper. Chicago: Chicago University Press

Murray, R. & Pearce, L. (2005). How to examine a thesis. New York: Open University Press

Murray, R. (2011). How to write a thesis. 3rd edition. New York: Open University Press

Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook. (2nd edition). London: Sage Pubications Ltd.

Stapleton, P. (2012). Gauging the effectiveness of anti plagiarism software: Empirical study of second language graduate writer. Journal for Academic Purposes. 11. P. 125-133.

Vardi, I. (2012). Developing students’ referencing skills: a matter of plagiarism and punishment and morality or of learning to write critically. Higher Education Research and Development. 31, 6, p.921-930

Wellington, J. (2010). Making supervision works for you. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v21i2.86

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Al-Ta lim Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Stats
Al-Ta’lim Journal published by Faculty of Islamic Education and Teacher Training UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Al-Ta'lim Online Journal
Print ISSN 1410-7546 Online ISSN 2355-7893


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.