Enhancing Islamic Students’ Reading Comprehension through Predict Organize Search Summarize Evaluate Strategy

Darmayenti Darmayenti, Martin Kustati


This paper is a report of an experimental research project conducted in a reading comprehension course for first-year students of the Adab Faculty of the State Institute for Islamic Studies Imam Bonjol Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia, during the academic year 2015/2016. The “Predict Organize Search Summarize Evaluate” (POSSE) is one strategy that can enhance students’ comprehension in reading. Two classes of Arabic and History students chosen through cluster random sampling technique were used as the sample of the research. Reading tests were used to collect the data which was given to both of classes on pre-test and post-test. The result of the research showed that the implementation of Predict Organize Search Summarize Evaluate strategy gave a significant difference in term of the students-learning outcome between the students who were taught through POSSE strategy and by traditional one. The finding of the study showed that teaching reading by using POSSE strategy gave significant effect towards students’ reading comprehension. This strategy could improve the students’ reading component on finding topic. It can be concluded that using POSSE Strategy has improved Indonesian students’ reading comprehension. It is also recommended for English lecturers use POSSE strategy as one of teaching strategies for reading comprehension.


Predict organize search summarize evaluate strategy, reading, comprehension

10.15548/jt.v24i1.265 Abstract view : 456 times PDF : 302 times

Full Text:



Abeywickrama, P., & Brown, H. D. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. NY: Pearson Longman.

Arianti, G., & Tiarina, Y. (2014). Teaching reading analytical exposition text to senior high school students by using posse (predict, organize, search, summarize, evaluate) strategy. Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(1), 195–201.

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871

Chou, P. T.-M. (2011). The effects of vocabulary knowledge and background knowledge on reading comprehension of Taiwanese EFL students. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(1), 108–115.

Collins, A., & Smith, E. E. (1980). Teaching the process of reading comprehension. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; No. 182.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Day, R., & Jeong-suk, P. (2005). Developing reading comprehension questions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 60.

Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Farstrup, A. E., & Samuels, S. J. (2002). What research has to say about reading instruction. What Research Has to Say about Reading Instruction.

Englert, C. S., & Mariage, T. V. (1991). Making students partners in the comprehension process: Organizing the reading “POSSE.” Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(2), 123–138.

Erawati, N. L. P. E. P. (2012). A comparative effect of metacognitive self-monitoring strategies on students’reading competency based on text types. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 1(1).

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education (Vol. 7). McGraw-Hill New York.

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction . Longman Publishing.

Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–320.

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2004). Teaching reading. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics.

Hancock, J. (1999). The Explicit Teaching of Reading. ERIC.

Harmer, J. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. London/New York.

Jitendra, A. K., & Gajria, M. (2011). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 43(8), 1.

Maha, E. R., & Sibarani, B. (2013). The Effect of Applying POSSE (Predict-Organize-Search-Summarize-Evaluate) on the Students’ Reading Comprehension. GENRE Journal of Applied Linguistics of FBS Unimed, 2(1).

Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centred curriculum: A study in second language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (2008). Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. The Journal of Education, 189(1/2), 77–94.

Sorrells, A. M., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2005). Case studies of resource room reading instruction for middle school students with high-incidence disabilities.

Sugiyono, P. D. (2008). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Westwood, P., & others. (2008). Interventions for Reading. What Teachers Need to Know about Reading and Writing Difficulties, 42.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v24i1.265


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Al-Ta lim Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Stats
Al-Ta’lim Journal published by Faculty of Islamic Education and Teacher Training UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Copyright © Al-Ta'lim Online Journal, Print ISSN 1410-7546 Online ISSN 2355-7893, All rights reserved

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.