Improving Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Writing Skills in Drafting Research Proposals Through the Think, Talk, Write (TTW) Learning Model

Eni Titikusumawati, Baskoro Adi Prayitno

Abstract


This research was to improve the prospective mathematics teachers’ writing skills in one of the universities in Indonesia. This was classroom-action research to improve students’ skills in writing research proposals. The quantitative and qualitative methods were used. Final year students were selected as the subjects. Observation sheets, questionnaires, interviews, anecdotal notes, and student final manuscripts were used as the instruments. The data were analyzed quantitatively to see improvements between cycles and learning completion. Data was also analyzed qualitatively to describe the improvements due to the TTW model after the data reduction and triangulation. The results showed that there were improvements to students’ writing skills by using the TTW model. Cycle #1 completion was 45.45%, Cycle #2 was 69.7%, and Cycle #3 was 81.82%. Students’ skills were improved because TTW provided exercises for thinking skills. TTW also improving speech skills by training students to speak in front of class forums, and improving writing skills by training the students to compile research proposals and providing opportunities to consult with teachers.

Keywords


Model; think talk write; writing skills.

10.15548/jt.v29i3.775 Abstract view : 710 times PDF : 691 times

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anggraeni, I. Y., & Apsari, Y. (2021). Students’ responses toward think talk write strategy in teaching writing. Professional Journal of English Education, 4(4), 568. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i4.p568-573

Bächtold, M. (2013). What do students “construct†according to constructivism in science education? Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2477–2496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9369-7

Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. In Intercultural Education (Third Edit, Vol. 20, Issue 2). Sage.

Hutabarat, L. (2021). The application think talk write learning model to improve composing short stories. Hortatori : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan

Sastra Indonesia, 4(2), 122–126. https://doi.org/10.30998/jh.v4i2.530

Ishaya, G. K., Rolona, R., & Damayanti, D. T. (2018). Talk and write your mathematical thinking. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 1(3), 279–282. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v1i3.p279-282

Kang, L. O., Brian, S., & Ricca, B. (2010). Constructivism in pharmacy school. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2010.01.005

Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating constructivism into instructional design: Potential and limitations. Educational Technology and Society, 8(1), 17–27.

Kemp, A., & Vidakovic, D. (2021). Ways secondary mathematics teachers apply definitions in Taxicab geometry for a real-life situation: Midset. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 62(January), 100848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100848

Kuslinar, K., Awaludin, A., & La Arapu, L. A. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe think talk write (Ttw) terhadap kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa kelas VIII SMPN 1 Sampara. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.36709/jppm.v7i1.8255

McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2016). You and your action research project. In You and Your Action Research Project (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315693620

Midgett, C. W., & Eddins, S. K. (2001). NCTM’s principles and standards for school mathematics: Implications for administrators. NASSP Bulletin, 85(623), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650108562306

Qurohman, M. T. (2018). Think to talk write learning mathematics tool hands on activity. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(3), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v1i3.78

Supandi, S., Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, R., Suyitno, H., & Dewi, K. (2018). Think-talk-write model for improving students’ abilities in mathematical representation. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1136a

Tajudin, N. M., & Chinnappan, M. (2016). The link between higher order thinking skills, representation and concepts in enhancing TIMSS tasks. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.9214a

Tiantong, M., & Teemuangsai, S. (2013). Student team achievement divisions (STAD) technique through the moodle to enhance learning achievement. International Education Studies, 6(4), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n4p85

Van Belle, R., Van Damme, C., Tytgat, H., & De Weerdt, J. (2022). Inductive graph representation learning for fraud detection. Expert Systems with Applications, 193(December 2021), 116463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116463




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v29i3.775

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Al-Ta lim Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Stats
Al-Ta'lim Journal published by Faculty of Islamic Education and Teacher Training UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Al-Ta'lim Online Journal
Print ISSN 1410-7546 Online ISSN 2355-7893


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.