Standing, Active vs Sitting, Torpid: a Management Decision

Bustami Usman; Ibrahim Champion; Asnawi Muslem; Iskandar Abdul Samad

doi:10.15548/jt.v25i1.378

Standing, Active vs Sitting, Torpid: a Management Decision

Bustami Usman, Ibrahim Champion, Asnawi Muslem, Iskandar Abdul Samad

Abstract

The aim of the study is to investigate the pros and cons of standing while working and studying. A qualitative research was employed where the data taken from education practitioners and students interested to learn and support the introduction of standing desks. The finding of the study show that students and sedentary workers now spend up to 85% of their waking hours,(+/-13.5 hrs/day), sitting viz: sitting at meals, sitting in transportation, sitting in schools or offices, sitting watching TV or looking at a handphone or an i-pad plus sitting whilst watching sport or playing computer games. Even if standing in classes became the default behaviour in all classes it could only result in a maximum of about 20 extra hours of standing per week during semesters and thus could only reduce the amount of time spent sitting by a maximum of 14% of waking hours to 71% of waking hours. The height of Standing Desks should be at the elbow height of the person concerned ie about 1.00m for senior high school and university students and adults. For primary school students the desk height for the standing desk is about 75cm – ie. the same as the desk height for normal sitting desks for adults. The study also did a small survey of educators, 66% of whom would support the introduction of standing desks. Finally the study found that 72 % of the students and their teacher supported the introduction of standing desks. It is hoped that some schools and offices will take the initiative to introduce standing desks on a larger scale.

Keywords

Standing desks; health benefits; improves attentiveness, better results for work and study.

10.15548/jt.v25i1.378

Abstract view : 830 times

PDF : 568 times

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aminian, S., Hinckson, E. A., & Stewart, T. (2015). Modifying the classroom environment to increase standing and reduce sitting. Building Research & Information, 43(5), 631–645.

Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405.

Benden, M. E., Wendel, M. L., Jeffrey, C. E., Zhao, H., & Morales, M. L. (2012). Within-Subjects Analysis of the Effects of a Stand-Biased Classroom Intervention on Energy Expenditure. Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, 15(2).

---, M. E., Zhao, H., Jeffrey, C. E., Wendel, M. L., & Blake, J. J. (2014). The evaluation of the impact of a stand-biased desk on energy expenditure and physical activity for elementary school students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(9), 9361–9375.

Benzo, R. M., Gremaud, A. L., Jerome, M., & Carr, L. J. (2016). Learning to stand: The acceptability and feasibility of introducing standing desks into college classrooms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(8), 823.

Blake, J. J., Benden, M. E., & Wendel, M. L. (2012). Using stand/sit workstations in classrooms: Lessons learned from a pilot study in Texas. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 18(5), 412–415.

Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.

Burns, A. (2003). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Cho, J., & Trent, A. (2006). Validity in qualitative research revisited. Qualitative Research, 6(3), 319–340.

Deardorff, J. (2012). Beverage-makers build playgrounds, draw criticism. Chicago Tribune.

Dornhecker, M., Blake, J. J., Benden, M., Zhao, H., & Wendel, M. (2015). The effect of stand-biased desks on academic engagement: An exploratory study. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 53(5), 271–280.

Gilson, N. D., Burton, N. W., Van Uffelen, J. G., & Brown, W. J. (2011). Occupational sitting time: Employees? perceptions of health risks and intervention strategies. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 22(1), 38–43.

Greene, J. P. (2005). Education myths: What special interest groups want you to believe about our schools–and why it isn’t so. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Greene, J. P., Forster, G., & Winters, M. (2005). Education myths. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Grunseit, A. C., Chau, J. Y.-Y., Van der Ploeg, H. P., & Bauman, A. (2013). “Thinking on your feet”: A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 365.

Hamilton, M. T., Healy, G. N., Dunstan, D. W., Zderic, T. W., & Owen, N. (2008). Too little exercise and too much sitting: inactivity physiology and the need for new recommendations on sedentary behavior. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 2(4), 292.

Hinckson, E., Salmon, J., Benden, M., Clemes, S. A., Sudholz, B., Barber, S. E., … Ridgers, N. D. (2016). Standing classrooms: research and lessons learned from around the world. Sports Medicine, 46(7), 977–987.

Lanningham-Foster, L., Foster, R. C., McCrady, S. K., Manohar, C. U., Jensen, T. B., Mitre, N. G., Levine, J. A. (2008). Changing the school environment to increase physical activity in children. Obesity, 16(8), 1849–1853.

Levine, J. A. (2014). Get Up!: Why Your Chair is Killing You and what You Can Do about it. Macmillan.

Minges, K. E., Chao, A. M., Irwin, M. L., Owen, N., Park, C., Whittemore, R., & Salmon, J. (2016). Classroom standing desks and sedentary behavior: a systematic review. Pediatrics, peds–2015.

Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. Wiley Online Library.

Reiff, C., Marlatt, K., & Dengel, D. R. (2012). Difference in caloric expenditure in sitting versus standing desks. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 9(7), 1009–1011.

Ringlein, J. F. (2016, May). Desk mounted vertically adjustable stand up desk.

Sherry, L. (1995). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(4), 337–365.

Silva, D. R., Minderico, C. S., Pinto, F., Collings, P. J., Cyrino, E. S., & Sardinha, L. B. (2018). Impact of a classroom standing desk intervention on daily objectively measured sedentary behavior and physical activity in youth. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport.

Starrett, K., & Cordoza, G. (2016). Deskbound: Standing Up to a Sitting World. Simon and Schuster.

Ur, P. (1999). A course in language teaching. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Vernikos, J. (2011). Sitting kills, moving heals. Fresno: Quill Driver Books.

Wendel, M. L., Benden, M. E., Zhao, H., & Jeffrey, C. (2016). Stand-biased versus seated classrooms and childhood obesity: A randomized experiment in Texas. American Journal of Public Health, 106(10), 1849–1854.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v25i1.378