Developing Professional Engagement through ESL Student Teachers’ Reflective Writing

Raja Nor Safinas Raja Harun


The objective of this paper is to examine how ESL student teachers identify their own learning needs, analyse, evaluate and expand their professional engagement as an individual or as a community of practice (COP) through reflective writing. In addition, the written discourses of their reflective entries are studied to illuminate the macro and micro elements of the reflective entries. This study mainly employs a qualitative study with some descriptive quantitative analysis. The participants are 27 ESL student teachers in their 6th semester. The instrument used is primarily the content analysis of the student teachers reflective entries. The entries are analysed for convergent and divergent ideas which are then generated into categories and themes based on the research questions stipulated. The findings have revealed that the reflective entries have addressed some pertinent issues related to the student teachers’ learning needs and how they have extended their understanding of those issues.    The reflective entries discourses have exhibited in-depth professional thinking which served as a platform for student teachers to meta-cognitively think about teaching. This study implicates the importance of such professional learning engagement activity in order to assist student teachers to be thinking about teaching.


Reflection, ESL student teachers, metacognitive thinking, professional engagement, community of practice and reflective writing discourses

10.15548/jt.v1i2.607 Abstract view : 39 times


Borg, S. (2006). The distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 3-31.

Cho, M. (2017). Pre-service L2 teacher trainees’ reflections: What do they focus on? English Teaching, 72(1), 105-129.

Dewey, J. (1933) How We Think: A Restatement Of The Relation Of Reflective Thinking To The Educative Process. Boston, MA: DC Heath.

Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Penguin Books.

Grossman, P. (2009). Structures for facilitating student reflection. College Teaching. 57(1), 15-22.

Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and Practice. London: Heinemann.

Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2008) New Learning: Elements of a science of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mezirow, J., & Associates (1990). Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Moon, J. A. (2006). Learning Journals: A Handbook for Reflective Practice and Professional Development. 2nd ed. London, UK: Routledge.

Ryan, M. & Ryan, M. (2012). Theorising a model for teaching and assessing reflective in higher education. Higher Education and Reflection Development, 32 (2), 1-14.

Schon, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

Ukpokudu, O. (2009). The Practice of Transformative Pedagogy. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching. 20(2), 43-67.

Ulusoy, M. (2016). Field experiences in teacher education: the perceptions and qualities of written reflections. Teaching in higher education, 21(5), 532-544.

Zia Tajeddin & Yasaman Aghabadazadeh. (2018). Blog mediated reflection for professional development : exploring themes and criticality of L2 teachers’ reflective practice. TESL Canada Journal. 35(2), 26-50.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Al-Ta lim Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Stats
Al-Ta’lim Journal published by Faculty of Islamic Education and Teacher Training UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Copyright © Al-Ta'lim Online Journal, Print ISSN 1410-7546 Online ISSN 2355-7893, All rights reserved

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.