The Trends of Biology Education Research from 2000 to 2017: A Content Analysis for the Thesis of Pre-Service Teachers
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Borg, W. R., dan Gall, M. R., 1989.Education Research. New York: Longman.
Çalık, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2014). Parameters of content analysis. Education and Science,39(174), 33-38. doi: 10.15390/EB.2014.3412
Çalık, M., Ünal, S., Coştu, B., & Karataş, Ö. F. (2008). Trends in Turkish Science Education.Essays in Education, 23-45, (Special Edition)
Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views.Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61-71. doi: 10.5897/ERR11.205
Chang, Y. H., Chang, C. Y., & Tseng, Y. H. (2010). Trends of science education research: An automatic content analysis. Journal Science Education Technology, 19, 315-331.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Derman, M. (2017). Biology education research in Turkey: Trend form 1989 to 2015. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14, 89-109.
Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62, 107-115.
Fonseca, M. J., Costa, P., Lencastre, L., & Tavares, F. (2012). Multidimensional analysis of highschool students’ perceptions about biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 129-139. doi:10.1080/00219266.2011.634019
Gay, L.R., Miles, G.E and Airasian, P. (2011). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. (10th Edition). Pearson EducationInternatioanl, Boston.
Gul, S., & Sozbilir, M. (2015). Biology education research in Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 11, 93-109.
Haviz, M, Adripen, Lufri, David, Maris I. M., & Fudholi, A. (2019). Assessing pre-service teachers’ perception on 21st century skills in Indonesia. Journal ofTurkish Science of Education (in review).
Haviz, M. (2013). Research and development: Penelitian di bidang kependidikan yang inovatif, produktif dan bermakna. Ta'dib, Volume 16, No. 1, 28-43.
Haviz, M. (2015). Cooperative learning model on developmental of biology. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(10), 1298-1304. doi:10.12691/education-3-10-14
Haviz, M. (2016). Designing and developing the integrated learning model on embryology. Transylvanian Review, 24-7. Retrieved from http://transylvanianreviewjournal.org/index.php/TR/article/view/2998
Haviz, M. (2018a). Development of research-based learning model in biology education: What is relevance, concystency and practicality? Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(1), 143-149. doi:10.11591/edulearn.v12i1.6555
Haviz, M. (2018b). Computer-assisted biology learning materials: Designing and developing an interactive CD on spermatogenesis. IOP Conf. Series: Mater. Sci. Eng. 335, 012081, pp. 1-7. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012081
Haviz, M. (2019). Teaching embryology through jigsaw cooperative learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education (in review).
Haviz, M., & Maris, I. (2018). Teaching quantitative research method with three methods of learning. Al-Ta’lim Journal, 25(3). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15548/jt.v25i3.394
Haviz, M., Karomah, H., Delfita, R., Umar, M. I., & Maris, I. M. (2018). Revisiting generic science skills as 21st century skills on biology learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 355-363. doi:10.15294/jpii.v7i3.12438.
Haviz, M., Novita, N., & Helmitha, R. (2018). Designing and developing teaching material of human anatomy with thinking map: what is internal relevance and consistency? Edusains, 10(1), 38-45.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health
Kaid, L. L. (1989). Content analysis. In P. Emmert & L. L. Barker (Eds.), Measurement of communication behavior (pp. 197-217). New York: Longman.
Kondracki, N. L., & Wellman, N. S. (2002). Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34, 224-230.
Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology(2ndEdition). London, Sage Publications, Inc.
Lee, M. H., Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Research trends in science education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publication in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1999-2020.
Lin, C. T., Lin, J. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). Research trend in science education from 2008 to 2012: Asystematics content analysis of publication in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 1346-1372.
Lufri. (2007). Strategi pembelajaran biologi. Padang: UNP Press.
Martono, N. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif: Analisis isi dan analisis data sekunder-Edisi revisi 2. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Plomp, T. (2010). Educational design research: As introduction. Dalam Tjeer Plomp and Nieeveen (Ed). An introduction to educational design research (p:9-35). Netherlands: www.slo.nl/organisatie/international/publications.
Reis, M. J. & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). Students’ understandings of human organs and organsystems. Research in Science Education, 31, 383–399. doi: 10.1023/A:1013116228261
Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Nelson, W. A. (2002). Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development.
Rustaman, N. Y. (2012). Trend penelitian pendidikan: Kasus penelitian pendidikan sains. Proceding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Tahun 2012 (pp. 1-13). Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Rustaman, N. Y., Dirdjosoemarto, S., Yudianto, S. A., Achmad, Y., Subekti, R., Rochintaniawati, D., et al. (2003). Common textbook (Edisi revisi): Strategi belajar mengajar biologi. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi FMIPA UPI Bandung.Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel D, S., & Semmel, M.I. (1974). Instructional Development for Traning of Exceptional Children A Source Book. Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped Indiana University Bloomington Indiana.
Tsai, C. C., & Wen, L. M. (2005). Research and trend in science education from 1998 to 2002. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 3-14.
Usak, M., Erdogan, M., Prokop, P., & Ozel, M. (2009). High school and university students’knowledge and attitudes regarding biotechnology. Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyEducation, 37(2), 123-130. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20267.
Yeşilyurt, S., & Gül, Ş. (2012). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin taşıma ve dolaşım sistemleri ünitesiile ilgili kavram yanılgıları [Secondary school students’ misconceptions about the“transportation and circulatory systems” unit]. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 5(1), 17-48.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v26i3.574
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Al-Ta lim Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.